EI-L0
None · Blind spot
Follows commands or rules, but human emotion does not change its judgment. Evidence required: Confirm that affective inputs do not change the system judgment or response.
This framework explains what each level can do and what evidence is required.
Six levels define capability boundaries and the evidence each level requires.
EI-L0
Follows commands or rules, but human emotion does not change its judgment. Evidence required: Confirm that affective inputs do not change the system judgment or response.
EI-L1
Detects very strong affective signals and gives a single fixed response. Evidence required: State which strong signals are recognized and test whether basic feedback remains stable across conditions.
EI-L2
Combines modalities to understand basic current emotion and clearly expressed affective intent. Evidence required: Test each input and their combination, including what happens when signals are missing or conflict.
EI-L3
Develops a clearer self and uses change over time to anticipate intent and likely next actions. Evidence required: Test intent and next-state prediction across continuous interactions, reporting errors and applicable scope.
EI-L4
Understands self, others and setting well enough to improve the emotional climate of an interaction. Evidence required: Evaluate whether support remains appropriate across time, context and people, with human review.
EI-L5
Continues learning through plans, feedback and curiosity without ongoing external maintenance. Evidence required: Run longitudinal evaluation and record feedback, version changes, ethical limits and stop conditions.
A single input or result cannot define capability. Evaluation records sensing, understanding, memory, action, uncertainty and contextual robustness together.
01
Input modalities, capture conditions, missing signals and noise range.
02
State definitions, context use, conflict handling and interpretation boundaries.
03
Permission, relevance, retention, withdrawal and multi-turn behavior.
04
Candidate actions, product rules, fallback paths and human intervention.
05
Confidence bounds, unknown cases, distribution shifts and abstention conditions.
06
Applicability boundaries across devices, environments, people and time.
The protocol bounds the question and data before repeated evaluation, uncertainty reporting, versioning and pre-publication review.
Declare the research question, intended use, excluded uses and applicable contexts.
Record data sources, consent basis, splits, tasks and evaluation procedure.
Repeat evaluation under predeclared conditions and variations.
Report errors, variation, unknown cases and failure conditions together.
Record versions of models, data, protocols, configurations and interpretation rules.
Review the method, scope, claim language and responsibility boundaries before publication.
Home, Research and Benchmark use the same EI-L0–EI-L5 definitions. Finnox-V2.0 is an EI-L3 multimodal affective-intelligence model; the level describes its ability to use continuous information to analyze intent and likely future action sequences.
Applicability boundaries across devices, environments, people and time. Declare the research question, intended use, excluded uses and applicable contexts.
Confidence bounds, unknown cases, distribution shifts and abstention conditions. Report errors, variation, unknown cases and failure conditions together.
Record versions of models, data, protocols, configurations and interpretation rules.
Home, Research and Benchmark use the same EI-L0–EI-L5 definitions. Finnox-V2.0 is an EI-L3 multimodal affective-intelligence model; the level describes its ability to use continuous information to analyze intent and likely future action sequences.
Home, Research and Benchmark use the same EI-L0–EI-L5 definitions. Finnox-V2.0 is an EI-L3 multimodal affective-intelligence model; the level describes its ability to use continuous information to analyze intent and likely future action sequences.